breaking coverage from sources


After three terrorists attacked London in minutes, in the spring my son knew more about it than I did. The alert on my phone from a news organization linked with information to a narrative; my son hit on the website Reddit, which was teeming with links to breaking coverage from sources in the scene.

He beaten me when the website has broken, by TV pictures being posted by people in states to Imgur and Snapchat tipped off,.

It has been like this in my home for some time now: Before I’ve watched the morning newspaper and put breakfast on the table, my son will pepper me with observations concerning the most current U.S. political news he has gleaned from watching the previous night’s chat shows on YouTube.

He not alone. A study by Google as well as the Canadian market research company Ipsos says the postmillennials called Generation Z check their mobiles on average 31.2 times each day. If events in the world break through the offspring’s reverie parents whose adolescents are spending with faces might wonder.

But anecdotal evidence and research suggest teens are consumers of information in ways that may differ sharply from their own parents, but from siblings that are old just a few years.

They care about present events more than you may think: A poll conducted this year to the U.S. non-profit media literacy basis Common Sense Media found that 48 percent of children ages 10 to 18 consider that “after the information is important to them{}” It is certainly enough for them: They have been growing up at their fingertips with thousands of outlets.

They have pushed Teen Vogue — that snagged lots of attention throughout the U.S. election for launching a political section featuring some sharp political opinion to new heights. Theyare a part of the market for channels like the news outlet The Young Turks, and helped spur a cottage industry of YouTube pundits.

Teens’ desire for information was a part of what prompted the fave program of sexters anyplace, Snapchat, to launch partnerships with dozens of content providers, because of its Discover feature, including The New York Times VICE and Vogue. (In america, 22 percent of Snapchat’s daily active users are 13 to 17, and an additional 36 percent are 18 to 24.) Discover’s approach helps ensure news can not get a toehold.

Kids’ ease with technology does not automatically mean they are media literate.

“On an anecdotal level, the children are exceptionally advised of what is happening,” notes Shannon Howson, a geography teacher at Ursula Franklin Academy at the West End of Toronto whose classes frequently take care of current events. “They are often keeping me abreast on issues.” Nevertheless, she said, she must remind pupils to think “about the validity of resources, knowing the prejudice and the skew of your resources and understanding if they are reputable. The kids don’t have any idea of that.”

Educators used to teach children to locate information. However, with information and other info now flooding their telephones 24 hours a day, the attention, says Jim Blackwood, a teacher-librarian in Jean Augustine Secondary School in Brampton, Ont., is on “how to critically analyze this information, and to offer the skills to discern what’s trustworthy.”

“If I were to ask students to do research on a specific topic, they are not always going to some source directly. They are going to Google, right?” he notes. “They run the danger of clicking onto ads and being directed somewhere perhaps they should not have gone to information that is not necessarily reputable.”

The Common Sense Media study found that children have difficulty separating news in the stuff. Many don’t appear to be trying very hard: 31 percent of kids using social networking platforms stated they cover “small” or “no focus” to the resources of stories they see there.

But they are a skeptical bunch: According to this analysis, while 66 percent of children 10 to 18 place “a lot” of confidence in the information that they receive from relatives, only 25 percent have the identical amount of trust in information organizations. (Mind you, that still puts the media over buddies, who are just reliable “a lot” by 17 percent of kids.)

If the news media had an issue with their standing before the U.S. election this past year, all the focus on fake news has put the issue at center stage.

That is created an urgent need for media outlets for a opportunity and education to woo audiences. In america, the tiny non-profit News Literacy Project last year established a comprehensive online program for teachers, at checkology.org, to help train students to think critically about the nature of credible information.

By learning how to talk to them and outlets are building trust with viewers.

Teen Vogue’s move to news coverage was the brainchild of Phillip Picardi, Vogue digital editorial manager, who told his bosses he understood how to raise the traffic of the site to 10 million.

“I said, that is pretty easy: You just speak to teens about what they really talk about, and about their own lives,” he says. Along with the political policy — “the first time that the brand’d talked about an election cycle, or police brutality in this sort of frank terms” — Picardi established a Wellness section. “This was the first time we spoke about masturbation, reproduction, [the morning-after pill] Plan B, etc..”

Teens are discussing world events — particularly during moments like the May 22 assault on the concert in Manchester, England of Ariana Grande. They are “trying to make sense of the place on earth, and of what is happening in the world, and thus they want a place to learn how to do this in a non-judgmental way that gives them the background information they need, and also discusses their language,” he says. If Teen Vogue does not give them that, they can go elsewhere. Last November — the month of the election — the website attracted 9.4 million unique users.

The independent news outlet The Young Turks turned into a progressive powerhouse within the past U.S. election cycle — it’s one of those top-ranked News and Politics stations on YouTube — in part by telling audiences that its corporate-owned competitors like MSNBC were not giving them the complete truth.

“Especially with all the young individuals that are connected to the world wide web, they look up everything, they realize we are providing coverage on issues which are not provided anywhere else,” says Steve Oh, the provider’s chief business officer. (On Tuesday, The Young Turks announced it had received $20-million (U.S.) in new funding, including an investment in WndrCo, the new mobile-entertainment holding company founded by Jeffrey Katzenberg.)

“Right now, we are perceived as being innovative and to the left, but with the new creation, the teenagers, the tweens and the millennials, we are as mainstream as they may be. We hit them dead in the middle for their perspectives and their viewpoints.”

Teen Vogue’s Picardi warns that, while teenagers have access to events and information unfolding they might not be equipped to handle the things that they encounter. “As journalists, we are feeling [overwhelmed],” he says. “We are constantly chasing these stories which are about brutality — homosexual men being persecuted in Chechnya, or in Indonesia. Plenty of the material that we are dealing with is hard to read. If we are feeling this as journalists, we can only imagine how teens feel, especially if they’re getting this unfiltered access.”

About the best way best to take care of the deluge, recently Teen Vogue has been counselling readers. “We have a good deal of coverage … that is about how to take a rest in the information and what to do if the news is stressing you out or traumatizing you. I believe that is a conversation that more parents and classrooms ought to be having with their children.”

Also on the Planet and Mail

Cyber security expert says HBO hack is ‘huge’ (The Associated Press)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *